|
|
| |
|
December 18, 2003
Commentary-
Boy, what a day we had. The ramp up from
yesterday's close continued without a break. Let's start with a look at that
grouping that I put on the 13-minute ES chart. The grouping was an area I
wanted to watch, to give me some idea of what the market's intentions
were.
This wasn't a grouping that I set up to make a trade against, it
was a grouping I wanted to watch, because I felt that if that opening pop from
Monday was an intermediate top, this is one of a few likely areas where I would
expect a failure. Keep in mind one of the things you'll hear me repeating over
and over again. If a grouping or pattern holds, it tells me something. And if
it doesn't, that tells me something.
After failing
to fall significantly off that grouping, the ES took it out like it wasn't
there. Let's look at the chart, with today's data on it.


This confirmed, for me, what side of the
market I wanted to be on. We already know that we had a fantastic setup below
this grouping, and that setup was far more significant to the market than the
grouping on this chart. Once I saw this grouping go, I was pretty sure what the
outcome of the pattern setup and this failed grouping was going to be.
Remember, a
'failed' setup or grouping is not a bad thing; it can be just as useful for
trading as one that 'works'. I set many of these up to see how an issue behaves
in that area, not solely to trade against.
Let's review yesterday's NQ setup
on the 3-minute chart.


This is how we left it at day's end. I was
playing the thrusts. Should I have been looking at the larger context more?
Let's look at the pattern on the 13-minute chart, with today's data on the
chart.


What I played yesterday were those
first two thrusts off the pattern completion. Once I saw the gap up, I knew
what was in store, and what side I wanted to be on. Yesterday's ramp up had
already taken out the grouping on our first chart from today's commentary. I
was expecting continued ramping, and if I got any confirmation, that's the side
I was going to play today.
The indices just ramped for the rest of the day, and
trend continuation techniques worked quite well. I was willing to jump on this
trend without waiting for a significant pullback for multiple reasons. I had
several patterns on my side. My grouping was taken out with no problem. And it
was the day before 'quadruple witching', which has really been a ramp day as of
late, in my opinion. That's enough for me to trade continuation
entries.
I don't feel it's necessary, at least for my trading, to catch
every pattern or grouping right 'in the zone' or forget it. If the play is
significant it will likely have many opportunities as it plays out. I feel that
one of my strengths as a trader is that I can trade 'harmonically', and
I can find ways to get in if I miss the exact harmonic entry. Just because I
played the pattern with too short of an outlook, as it turned out, doesn't mean
that I'm done until the next pattern shows up. It's just something to think
about.
Let's look at something that I spotted on the 60-minute ES
chart.


I spotted this pattern setting up
in the ES. But what really caught my eye is another pattern forming right on
top of it. Let's look at the same chart, but with the other pattern
highlighted.


There is an alternate ABCD pattern
setting up right in the same area. If the ABCD wants to go to an AB=CD level,
it lands just about exactly on my new 1.902 Fibonacci retracement for the XA
pattern external retracement. Now why would I suspect that the ABCD might not
make it to the AB=CD point? Go back further on the 60-minute chart. There is an
even larger ABCD pattern setting up. It completes at just about 1095. Go back
to November 21 for point A and do some calculations.
I'm getting
interested in the area between 1095 and 1099. But I must add in a strong caveat
here. As outlined in Kane Trading
on: Advanced Fibonacci Trading Concepts, I don't use the techniques to
try to pick the ends of major trends. And this thing has been in a monster
trend for nine months.
I'm not going to call the end of that. My use
for this area is to potentially play a countertrend trade on the lower
timeframe, if one gets going, and for use in managing open trades. No
way am I expecting the entire uptrend to end at this point. I'm watching how it
behaves here, though, to decide which side of the market I want to be on.
Let's finish with a quick look at what AMLN is doing. Here's the
daily chart, with the groupings.


I'm glad that I waited and opted for a higher
confirmation entry technique, as I mentioned in my commentary from the 15th.
This kept me out of this trade and out of the gap down. If I had not decided to
up my entry requirements based on the poor market action at the time, I would
be stopped out. Such is trading.
The news I heard was that AMLN was
asked by the FDA for additional information on one of their drugs. Even though
the word is that they likely already have that information available, the
market hated the news, and that's all I care about. It is interesting that the
gap was through both the groupings, but not through the big gap that we have
been watching. That gap still is not closed.
I am still
watching this one. If it starts to trickle down from here (beyond closing the
gap at 21.25) I'll abandon it. If it starts to go up I may consider it for a
trade. This type of high volume, climaxing over-reaction right in the potential
trade area can sometimes set up a fantastic trade. I wanted an educational
example for the readers, and this has been more than I could ask for. This one
is chock full of trading reality. I'll update this as it plays out.
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
NOTE: Reading this page or any page on the Kane
Trading website, or utilizing this website and any material
contained herein in any way, shall constitute an acknowledgement
that you have read, understood and agreed to all the
disclaimers,
terms & conditions, and
policies of this site.
 |
|
This website is best viewed with
MSIE 6.0, text size set to medium, and screen resolution set to 1024 by 768.
Copyright © 2003 Kane
Trading. All rights reserved.
 |
|