|
|
| |
|
November 26, 2003
Commentary-
Today I'd like to discuss a few aspects of
this column, and then we'll move on to a few charts. First off, I would like to
thank everyone who has sent in the feedback that I asked for in my last column.
So far, the results are leaning towards more follow-up in exchange for a little
bit less market variety. I will wait for a few more responses to come in, and
then do my best to respond to the desires of the readers.
I've also
received a few questions about what time I plan to post the commentary, which
days, and so on. At this point I am trying hard to post one commentary for each
trading day. I will make that post as soon as I can after the trading day has
ended. Sometimes my schedule prevents me from doing this directly after the
market closes. On those days, I will post it as soon as I reasonably can that
night.
I know this is a bit tough on my east coast readers. I'm hoping
that once the website responsibilities, and the extra work that I have been
doing in these 'early days', settles down, I will be able to be more timely for
the east coast. As far as posting days, in general I will post Monday through
Thursday after the market closes. Even though Friday's commentary will be dated
for that particular Friday, I consider that commentary more of a 'weekend'
commentary. Hence, I will post it some time before Sunday night.
This way I
can take a little break from the website (and trading) after Friday's close,
and have more time to think about, and select, the best material that I can for
the column. This leads me to why I'm bringing all this up now. I got a few
e-mails asking me where Wednesday's commentary was (don't you folks ever take a
holiday??). I thought I was clear that Wednesday was my last day this week for
watching the market. I may glance at the charts on half-days, but that's
it.
So this Wednesday is like the end of the trading, and column
posting, week for me. I then planned to post the Wednesday commentary some time
before Sunday night. I apologize that I wasn't anywhere near as clear on this
as I could have been. To respond to the requests, then, I'm getting this posted
Friday morning (but still dating it Wednesday), and the next column will be
Monday, after the market closes. Again, thanks for the constructive feedback,
and I'll do my best to listen to my reader's needs. And hopefully this has
cleared up what I plan to do with the column.
Let's look at something interesting
I thought about with Wednesday's trading. One of the things that I feel that
'pattern' traders and Fibonacci traders have to watch out for is focusing so
hard on the patterns and numbers that they miss out on something obvious on the
chart. Just because you have chosen the style of trading that you have doesn't
mean that you shouldn't at least keep an eye on some of the 'old school' stuff.
I think one of the things that I do particularly well as a trader is retain
some of my 'older' and more basic skills, and integrate them into my pattern
and Fibonacci trading.
Just because I trade a lot of patterns and use a very
Fibonacci intensive approach to trading doesn't mean that I don't also 'just
play the trend' from time to time, for example. I also find that by watching
the basics that many other traders watch, I can see the areas where the
'wrong-way crowd' is going to be getting suckered. I love moving average
crossovers. I have them on many of my charts. Do you know why?
I know that
an absolutely huge number of traders are watching, and using, them. I can put
some selected moving averages on my chart, step back, and sometimes in an
almost uncanny way, say something like: 'OK, give this a little bit more, get
ready, here it comes, OK, now, here comes the rush up and then the slam down
and the bail out.' You can just see the traders getting set up over and over
again in these certain areas.
In my opinion, the ever-proliferating small
hedge funds, called 'hedgies' by many, just sit around and do this to small
traders all day long, especially with the market action so poor (compared to
the 'bubble' bull market days). Take a rough guess what the program trading
volume is at the NYSE. Approximately 41%! And that is not a new phenomenon. If
you want to check into this, go to their website and see how long this has been
going on.
My point is how do you think the 'hedgies' choose the spots to play
this game? They watch all the basic areas where new traders will try to trade.
I want to have an idea where things may happen. Let's look at a 3-minute chart
of the ES, and we'll try to see if something simple was evident. I'll start
with the sharp sell-off in the morning.


The ES is trending down nicely on this
3-minute chart. Many traders are getting on board this trend and shorting. I
see nothing on this chart to alert me to any problems with this approach. But,
as I mention so many times, where's the context? If I'm trading the 3-minute
chart, I'm getting my 'context' from the 13-minute chart (and maybe even the
60-minute chart). Let's look at the 13-minute chart.


That changes everything. I don't need any Fibonacci or
any patterns or anything to see trouble. Do you see it? Let me add a line onto
the chart.


I drew a line
through the approximate middle of that congestion that formed after the big gap
and run on Monday. This is a 'do or die' area. If they break it, the next move
would likely be to close the gap. But this is where the most likely spot for a
reversal is going to come. And if it doesn't, that tells me something. But one
thing is for sure; I don't want to initiate a short right on support that
appears this significant. And if I'm short, I want to be ready to aggressively
manage my position in here. Let's see what this did with that area by the line
that I drew in.


Although one
may have been using some serious Fibonacci in here (you know I was), one still
shouldn't overlook the obvious and the basic, the 'old school', if for no other
reason than you know how many traders are watching those areas. I look at it
this way: I follow my game plan, but I also follow everyone
else's game plan, too.
The next commentary will appear on Monday, December 1.
In that column I will look at one more aspect along these lines that I was not
able to get to in today's write up. That is, unless something more interesting
happens on Monday.
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
NOTE: Reading this page or any page on the Kane
Trading website, or utilizing this website and any material
contained herein in any way, shall constitute an acknowledgement
that you have read, understood and agreed to all the
disclaimers,
terms & conditions, and
policies of this site.
 |
|
This website is best viewed with
MSIE 6.0, text size set to medium, and screen resolution set to 1024 by 768.
Copyright © 2003 Kane
Trading. All rights reserved.
 |
|